Wednesday, February 27, 2008

Go sleep now?

Since I was writing my paper on labyrinths, I wanted to wait to read everyone's comments on the film until after I had finished. Preserve my initial assessment type thing. Of course, now that I'm all done and have read the billion comments I never want to write about labyrinths again. Nevertheless, I would like to get the class's opinion on something (something I didn't write about in my paper. Yay!) Unlike, say, the movie Labyrinth with David Bowie, very little of the fantastical action takes place within the garden maze. Ofelia's ordeal with the toad arguably occurs underground, not in a branch of the magical kingdom. In the meantime, what the official Pan's Labyrinth website calls an ogre, a.k.a. the Pale Man exists in an intriguing, yet unspecified location. Basically, I'm used to the monsters staying in the labyrinth and wondered if these creatures were also somehow trapped by the labyrinth's power. I find it somewhat strange to think of a kingdom as idealistic as Princess Moanna's harboring Mr. Creepy Cannibal.
While I'm at it, I also want to note my disappointment regarding the second challenge. For starters, Ofelia accomplished that task for all practical purposes by retrieving the knife. So the faun had no good reason to revoke her birthright. For finishers, why did Ofelia go through that harrowing experience if the blood of the innocent could just as suitably be shed with a gun? I feel the faun is at fault somewhere and hope the king gives him a stern talkin to.

3 comments:

ReneeRivas said...

I think the inconsistencies could either be explained by the 'fairy tale' logic hypothesis OR the she's really having a bit of a stress-induced mental break. :) Although, you know, the faun did say that he just needed a few drops of blood. Yet Ofelia doesn't believe him because he's a creepy man with a knife, and she's read too many fairy tales.

But I do agree that the inconsistencies were a bit annoying.

Laurie S said...

Yes, I also find it weird that the monsters are not contained within the Labyrinth, but I suppose one could explain that using a simple inversion theory. The magic kingdom Ofelia is trying to return to exists within the Labyrinth while the monsters she needs to escape exist without (Captain Vidal, the Toad, the Pale Man). Unlike Prince Theseus and the girl from the David Bowie movie, Ofelia is not trying to get to the center of the Labyrinth in order to face a monster, fight and go home. Because Ofelia's ideal home *is* the center of the Labyrinth it wouldn't really make sense for it to contain her worst fears.

Casey S. said...

I'm still struggling with what this movie has to do with labyrinths, be they physical, symbolic or mythological. There is the one physical labyrinth with the well in the center, but I have that annoying perfectionist-itch that convinces me that there must be SOME deeper meaning to the title. I'm not sure if I would agree that this physical labyrinth is the labyrinth invoked in the title, but you make a very interesting point. The monsters in this story are apparently not trapped by the bounds of any labyrinth. I hadn't noticed that before.

But maybe (and this is probably a stretch) this labyrinth is defined by Ofelia's perceptions. These monsters are trapped within her mind, a labyrinth of her subconscious creation. After all, the Captain cannot see the faun. I think that this suggests how Ofelia's world is accessible only to her; her monsters cannot act upon anyone but her. And Ofelia herself is arguably busy traversing the labyrinth. This seems rather cyclical in and of itself, though: the architect of the labyrinth being trapped inside of the labyrinth.

And another thing: in the mythological labyrinth, virgins were sent in as sacrifices to the minotaur who lives in the center. Ofelia herself is a sacrifice when she reaches the middle and is killed by a very minotaur-ish figure. I honestly can't believe we missed this in class...